Decomposing FoHF returns
Where and when funds of hedge funds add and lose value
Read More
Join us and our panel of experts for HFMWeek's Subscribers'…
28/04/2010
I’ve followed the AIFM Directive’s journey first-hand – or as close to first-hand as a London base will allow – from its controversial birth through to the no-less controversial redrafting process still underway, and, though setbacks have littered the way, it does feel that we are now in a better place. Just.
Of course, those of us who remember the original draft’s many defects would argue that some progress was inevitable. And with third-country issues still ominously up in the air, it would be best to exercise a hefty degree of caution in any 12-month review.
Yes, upgrades on leverage and valuation appear secured, and provisions relating to depositories and short-selling have been, if not resolved, at least improved, but the politics inherent in the process means that everyone – both for and against – will have to come away with some kind of victory. A sizeable defeat over third-countries could still overshadow progress made elsewhere.
That said, the recent voting postponements have provided what the debate needed more than anything – time. Any opportunity to revisit the draft, and its third-country provisions in particular, should be seen as positive.
A year into the redrafting process, and the phrase 'two steps forward and one step back' has rarely been more apt. It’s difficult to predict what the next few weeks will hold, but with improvements in the bag and time still a factor, there are reasons to be hopeful.
29/02/2012
Join us and our panel of experts for HFMWeek's Subscribers' Club February's UK breakfast briefing…
29/02/2012
The next US HFMWeek Subscribers' Club breakfast, will take place on Wednesday February 29. Join…
02/02/2011
HFMWeek's European Hedge Fund Services Awards are designed to recognise companies that have outperformed...
Be the first to comment on this article!